Throughout
his career Ben Thompson defied categorization. He founded two
substantial architectural firms; was a teacher and head of an
architectural school; an influential designer, importer, and marketer of
furniture and furnishings; a successful restaurateur — and, through all
these, often concurrent careers, a fervent apostle of hope for the
revival of cities.
Ben
characterized his entry into architecture and design as a “lucky
chance.” He was raised in an artistic environment and exposed to the
vitality of European cities by his mother, a painter, writer, and early
collector of modern art, who encouraged his energetic drawing and
painting. After initial studies at the University of Virginia, he
received a BFA in architecture from Yale in 1941. There he experienced
the tension between an entrenched Beaux Arts tradition and an emerging
Modernism. As a student, he focused on socially-oriented problems, such
as experimental schools: education was to become a crucial concern of
his first two decades of practice.
In
1946, after serving five years as an officer in the Navy and
participating in the founding conference of the UNO, Ben and some
friends from Yale invited Walter Gropius to join them in a new
cooperative practice in Cambridge, Massachusetts. They called it The
Architects Collaborative — “TAC.” It was to be a living demonstration of
teamwork in the search for appropriate architectural expression. A
singularly close personal relationship developed between Ben and
Gropius, in whom Ben enjoyed the tutelage of an idealistic, tolerant,
worldly mentor.
Ben’s
work at TAC reflected an increasing interest in regionally appropriate
expression and materials — and particularly in brick as a material which
could lend not just texture and color but humanity to a building
because its basic module is scaled to the human hand and eye. The
texture of brick, sometimes painted, became a counterpoint to the planar
logic of plate glass and structural concrete, which was often
bush-hammered to a stone-like surface. By the 1960s, Ben had developed a
rationalist vo-cabulary based upon the inherent freedom of the exposed
two-way concrete waffle slab. It allowed variations in span and
configuration in response to demands of program and site without
sacrificing tectonic logic. It promoted a freedom of plan, space, and
window-wall treatment, with great flexibility in response to uneven
terrain, and encouraged a dynamic asymmetry of plan that retained a
consistent sense of humanity and scale.
Paralleling
his sensitivity to site and context, Ben developed an interest in the
adaptive reuse of old buildings. In the late 1950s he renovated the
historic dormitories within Harvard Yard — giving them new interior
arrangements without visible exterior changes. Shortly thereafter he
persuaded Harvard not to raze Boylston Hall, an 1857 academic building,
but rather to remodel it. There, however, he subtly juxtaposed new
details with the historic fabric.
Meanwhile,
in 1953, Ben had entered the world of interior design and, as
important, of retailing by opening a shop called Design Research —
always known as D|R. By the 1960s D|R would become the most influential
showcase of modern domestic design in the U.S. Through it, Ben
introducing a generation of Americans to well designed and crafted, and
often specially commissioned products — such as the bold Marimekko
fabrics and fashions from Finland. D|R added stores in New York (1964)
and San Francisco (1965). D|R’s Cambridge headquarters building (1969),
which he designed, remains a landmark in his oeuvre and in the Harvard
Square townscape. The totally transparent, glass-walled D|R building —
five floors of shopping-as-theater — was his first exploration of the
marketplace environment and an explicit statements of his belief in
architecture as an unobstructive neutral container for the “natural
chaos and unpredictability of life.”
Ben
was also teaching at Harvard during these years and in 1964 Gropius
selected him to succeed Gropius as Department Chairman. Ben’s four-year
tenure was devoted to actively relating design education to social needs
and to Ben’sconcern for the natural and urban environments. He
introduced a “real world” teaching methodology, emphasizing knowledge of
materials, respect for the craft of construction, understanding the
building's purpose, and recognition of its true users. Teachers from
varied disciplines conveyed a clearer sense of the real (as opposed to
abstract and academic) tasks of architecture. He encouraged the design
studio and working office to intermingle, merging theory and practice,
using real issues, people, and design procedures. He also used his
position more broadly. Across the country, in academic settings and
professional gather-ings, he argued against academicism in architecture
and against a sterile impersonal attitude toward planning that was
equally hostile to nature and community patterns. He argued for quality,
human scale, craftsmanship, compassion, and an elusive quality — joy.
In
1966, Ben left TAC to establish Benjamin Thompson & Associates —
“BTA.” He wanted more control over his work, so that it might better
reflect his growing concern with the larger implications of architecture
for the culture and spirit of cities, and for the diminishing quality
of the natural environment. BTA's direction was strongly influenced by
the social upheavals of the times. He renounced the intellectualization
of “inevitable” urban decay, arguing that there had to be a vision of
what a city could and should be. His 1966 essay, “Visual Squalor and
Social Disorder,” addressed the effects of the built environment on
human behavior and argued for an architecture of “joy and sensibility”
as a norm for modern urban life.
That
idea became both an ideal, which he called “The City of Man,” and a
vital part of every BTA undertaking. The City of Man had to reflect
human scale and involvement with social activity, and equally an
awareness of nature and of things natural: of changing seasons, of
orientation to water, and of places “intimate by day and radiant by
night,” where the “lovely unpredictability of life” would be nurtured
and experienced on a daily basis. To make the “City of Man” more
tangible, he developed a triple-image impressionistic slide show
accompanied only by music — a living collage of his favorite urban
experiences as a model of a better world. This unique modeling technique
became a key component of his design method and encouraged his further
exploration of the City of Man ideal.
There
also had to be working examples of the City of Man: viable,
true-to-life, ur-ban demonstrations. In 1967 he proposed reviving
Boston's historic markets with food stalls, cafes, restaurants, and
pushcarts, all operated by local merchants. Ben’s Faneuil Hall
Marketplace opened in 1976 and was an immediate commercial and popular
success — and a model of adaptive historic rehabilitation by an
architect of unimpeachable modernist credentials. It demonstrated his
theories of the evolution of buildings over time, in response to growth,
changing uses, and new techniques, and was a working prototype for part
of his vision of a revived urban life. With Faneuil Hall Marketplace,
Ben “invented” a new building type, the “festival marketplace.” BTA
subsequently designed market-places in various cities — each responsive
to its circumstances and requiring a different form and design solution.
South Street Seaport in Manhattan (1985), the most complex of these,
was also the first of many comprehensive urban waterfront reclamation
projects oriented to pedestrian pleasure and amenity.
Beginning
the 1960s, Ben’s active and essential partner in all ventures,
including BTA, D|R, and the restaurants that they opened in the 1970s
and ran for many years — first Harvest in Harvard Square and then
several in Faneuil Hall Marketplace — was his wife, Jane Fiske McC.
Thompson.
In
1984 Ben built the Ordway Music Theater, St. Paul, Minnesota — the
first of two carefully crafted multi-hall performance centers whose
public spaces celebrate the communal nature of attending a play or
concert.
If
Ben may have appeared a less than orthodox modernist in the 1950s and
1960s — sometimes seeming conservative in his concern for existing
buildings and contexts — by the Post Modernist 1980s BTA's work seemed
equally unconventional because it eschewed explicit PoMo references to
traditional styles. Instead, it unashamedly combined modern directness
of materials with inspiration drawn from vernacular and contextual
sources. Ben’s goals and collaborative method of design — rooted in his
early association with Gropius — remained consistent. Having never
accepted arbitrary rules of style, having held to the primacy of
functional, sensory, and ethical issues, Ben steered a personal course,
designing with instinctive regard for the character of the site, the
animation of water, the play of light and shadow, while using materials
with direct simplicity. For Ben the “reading” of a building — its tale
of what it does, how it stands up, its layers of history — was the
essence of architectural expression.
In
the late 1980s Ben’s ideal “City of Man” was realized on a larger scale
through comprehensive mixed-use city scale planning/design projects —
most relating to waterside settings. Auckland, Amsterdam, Cardiff, and
Glasgow accepted BTA masterplans for revitalizing major sites on
neglected river fronts and harbor edges and BTA carried through designs
for reclamation of Dublin's historic Custom House Docks. With these
comprehensive proposals, Ben explored a new urban genre that integrated
multiple uses into balanced city districts combining old and new
elements within a carefully controlled sense of scale, and incorporating
traditional street and site patterns.
In
addition to numerous design awards, Ben has received honorary
doctorates from Colby College, The University of Massachusetts, and
Minnesota College of Art and Design. In 1987 BTA received the AIA Firm
Award and in 1992 Ben was honored with the AIA Gold Medal.
Ben retired from active professional life in 1993.Denis DeWitts
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario